Tuesday 2 February 2021

BAD HENRY, IN THE BEST SENSE

 

The seventies are not a highly regarded era. The flaming comet that was the sixties, the music, the movements, the personalities and the violence dwarfed its following act of a decade.  The sixties are noted as being the time of the “Baby Boom” generation – but that neglected the fact that the actual defined period of the baby boom extended from 1946 to 1964, so a number of the children who qualified for “boomer” status never really experienced the sixties as anything other than breakfast cereal, Saturday morning cartoons, baseball cards, easy bake ovens, candy bars and lunchboxes emblazoned with the star of the day.  If you were in the single digits age-wise, you were just as much a member of the baby-boom, but you got through the sixties without marching, without remembering where you were (if you were anywhere) when JFK got shot, never got a draft card, never stayed up at night dropping acid and playing Sgt. Pepper on the day of its release – never shared in the experiences that everyone said were the "shared experiences" of your generation.  Born in 1963 – I was one of those kids.

It wasn’t so bad – we tend to sanitize the past in order to play to our sense of nostalgia, and so overlook the fact that the marchers often got their heads beat in, that getting a draft card could very well mean you got, you know, drafted and sent to Vietnam, that dropping acid and listening to Sgt. Pepper on day one might lead to a bad trip – so that you could never listen to “When I’m Sixty-Four” without breaking out in a cold sweat and wanting to hide in the bathroom.

And they play that song a lot.

Instead, those of us who were late boomers had a different set of generational milestones by which to measure our childhoods.  Our parents, aunts, uncles, older siblings and cousins had Elvis or the Beatles on Ed Sullivan, the Mickey Mouse Club, Howdy Doody, a whole series of assassinations, hell – those guys got the first seven (out of nine) verses of “We Didn’t Start the Fire”. Even then, when Billy Joel got to our time growing up he missed most of the biggies.  Are you seriously telling me Pasternak gets a mention but nothing rhymed with “Rumble in the Jungle”, “Thrilla in Manila” or “Vader is Luke’s dad”?

What about “terrorist Olympiad”?

Billy Joel may have blanked on our actual milestones – but we did have them.  Hell, there was one stretch of less than a year where John Lennon, Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II and Anwar Sadat all got shot. Of course, not every milestone is predicated upon violence.  I actually prefer that we measure our childhood by Fridays with the Brady’s and Partridge Family and not evenings with Lucy and Ricky or rigged quiz shows.  Here are a few more of the pre-teen experiences that were big deals for my crowd – to keep things simple we’ll just concentrate on one year - 1974:

Evel Knievel attempts to jump the Snake River canyon: -This was a huge event in the sixth grade.  Knievel wanted to try to jump the Grand Canyon but the government blocked the attempt so now he was going to take a rocket cycle and jump the Idaho canyon.  The week we all got back to school the daredevil went for it – only to have the cycle’s chute deploy prematurely and leave him wet but alive in the water at the bottom of the gorge.  Did he pull the handle himself?  We’ll never know…  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5LdesoNFpY

Patty Hearst gets kidnapped and then joins up with her kidnappers: - The Symbionese Liberation Army snatched the heiress in February and by April she was participating in bank robberies while holding a gun.  It remains possibly the weirdest kidnapping story of all time and it still isn’t clear to what extent Hearst was brainwashed or just decided she was going to join up with her captors.

Philippe Petit walks on a highwire between the twin towers of the World Trade Center: This was amazing to watch and has remained a fascination for many. At the time I remember flipping the channel from newscast to newscast wondering first how he did it and then, along with many others, how did he ever get all the stuff up on the roof to make it happen. The Oscar winning documentary “Man on a Wire” examines just this one event in detail – I highly recommend it.  I only wish this was still the thing that the towers remain best known for.

There were all of these in 1974, plus the Nixon resignation, the aforementioned “Rumble in the Jungle” and many other events besides. America was ramping up for its bicentennial (it’s hard to believe we’re now only five years out from the 250th celebration, which will teach many the term “Sestercentennial” for the first time) and, in the nearer term there was a Presidential election scheduled for 1976.  An obscure Georgia politician, Jimmy Carter, announced his candidacy at the end of 1974, but no one seriously believed he would win.  Indeed, Carter’s announcement certainly wasn’t the biggest news out of Georgia that year.

No, the biggest story out of Georgia in 1974 was that of Henry Aaron, who passed Babe Ruth for the all-time home run record in April, just at the beginning of that year’s baseball schedule.  There had never really been any doubt that Aaron would break the record during this season – after all he had come into the year sitting on 713 home runs and would need only two more to get the job done.  Given that Aaron had been averaging 40 home runs or so per season for about the past 15 years this, barring unforeseen circumstances, was not going to be a problem.

“Barring unforeseen circumstances”.

That seems a fairly benign statement.  To tell the truth – it should be.  You include something like that in most all predictive declarations, particularly when the possibility is seen as remote.  Let me demonstrate by giving a few simple examples.  “Barring unforeseen circumstances” the Covid vaccine will not be available to all people in time for the 2021 celebration of St. Patrick’s Day.  In this case the unforeseen event would have to be something like the discovery that it is possible to quickly produce the vaccine in powder form so that it can be mixed up and taken like Kool-Aid.  “Barring unforeseen circumstances” Rory McIlroy would beat me in a head to head golf match.  Such circumstances might include Rory having to wear oven mitts on his hands.  Okay – Rory having to wear oven mitts and being blindfolded.  Another example - one of the television shows on the air in 1974 was “The Partridge Family”, nearing the end of its run.  Susan Dey was one of the stars and it is safe to say that 1974 me would, “barring unforeseen circumstances” never sleep with Susan Dey.  Those unforeseen circumstances would have to include advanced puberty and the death of every other man on earth.

You get the picture.


The problem with applying that saying to Henry Aaron’s quest to break Babe Ruth’s record is that - while from a purely statistical baseball perspective it would have been as unlikely an event as my bedding Ms. Dey for him not to become the home run king – there were other elements at play that might have made such an outcome tragically foreseeable. 

Aaron’s journey to reach and break the home run record is both one of baseball’s most uplifting tales and, simultaneously, one of America’s most shameful.  Throughout 1973 and leading up to the opening of the 1974 baseball season media attention crystallised around the upcoming event.  Along with the publicity came the nuts – and there were legions of them.  Every racist in America seemed to feel it was their sworn duty to send Henry Aaron a letter telling him how disgraceful it was that a Black man was approaching the “sacred” record of Babe Ruth, how horrible it was to have to tell children that this was taking place and how that outcome might be avoided by eliminating Aaron before it took place.  (By the way, take a glance through the sampling of attached letters – as you might have guessed they weren’t calling him a “Black man”).  Seriously – people were threatening to kill Hank Aaron because he was good at baseball. 

And because he was Black.


 


I think it’s really important not to forget that that those two things went together in the racist, hate filled minds of those who were writing such letters or phoning those threats.  I’m not so naïve as to think that the people writing and sending those messages would have thought Henry Aaron was a great guy if he had only been black and not also incredibly talented – but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t take the time to threaten to kill him.  Of course – if he had been talented and White they would have lionized him.  But what brought things to the next level was that, in their eyes, Aaron had the presumption to be both Black and talented. That just didn’t compute in their narrow world views and therefore could not be allowed. 

You still see examples of that mind set to this day.  If Barack Obama had simply been good old Barry, a black kid who went to law school and took a job somewhere on Wall Street – that’d be OK.  Of course, that wasn’t the path he took. If he’d been a white guy who headed up the Harvard Law Review, wowed the Democratic National Convention, got himself elected Senator, took on and beat Hillary Clinton and became President – there still would have been the usual partisan bickering – but I’ll tell you right now – no one would have been demanding to see his birth certificate.

But none of these harsh truths were known to my ten-year old self back in April of 1974.  All I knew was that I was a baseball fanatic, Aaron was about to break the record and I wanted to see it happen.  In March my grandfather brought me to the newsagent’s shop where he picked up his daily papers and saw me leafing through the 1974 edition of the “Complete Handbook of Baseball”.  Despite it having what, to me, seemed the exorbitant price of $1.50, he bought it for me.  I have it to this day and will sometimes find myself leafing through its pages to see what may have been written about various teams, players or statistics.  For a baseball nut having something like that book is fascinating – a window into the past.  There are all kinds of quirky things in there – like how the Red Sox were deemed to have “possibly the best pitching staff in the division” in 1974 (nope), or how “Mike Tyson” was considered to be the Cardinals' answer at shortstop. (Presumably no relation).




But really what I bought the book for was the material concerning Aaron and his drive for 715.  There was an article setting out which pitchers he had victimized the most times throughout his career (the leader was Don Drysdale – a Hall of Fame pitcher himself, showing just how good Aaron was).  Then there was the small bio within the Atlanta Brave team pages.  It listed the following about Aaron: “Man of even temperament and uncommon patience”.


He would have to be to put up with the shit that was being thrown at him.  Things got so bad that the FBI designated people to monitor Aaron and his family.  Guards were assigned to look at the higher vantage points at the various stadia where the Braves might play in order to intercept potential snipers.  Even in his home park Aaron was subjected to racist abuse.  He played on, hitting an incredible 40 home runs in the face of all the pressure at 39 years old.  That number left him at the aforementioned 713 as he entered the 1974 season – needing one to tie Ruth and two to break the record.  First – he had to get through the winter, as the threatening phone calls persisted and the hate mail piled up.

While there were whisperings in the press I was aware of none of this as I read through the book I had purchased and readied for opening day.  All I really knew is that the record was sitting there waiting to be broken. It didn’t take Aaron long to show that the haters hadn’t gotten to him.  On his first swing of the '74 season he hit a monster home run to reach the previously magic number of 714.  The nation waited a few more days, then, on Aaron’s return to his home park in Atlanta, this happened:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=BNZl6HN5c-0&fbclid=IwAR04Oe4hZIi5v-nB04GNG8N8mVJ3hcgLnjM2VRI7VUYYmZXN2mF6rMiZBlg

I remember flipping stations just to watch the highlight replay wherever I could.  It wasn’t that hard – we only got three channels back then – but the scene was shown numerous times over the next few days and was burned into memory.  The pitch coming in, Aaron waiting on it until he seems to pounce on the high fastball, whipping the bat around with his tremendously strong wrists.  Aaron’s swing was like very few others – he could wait on a pitch until it was almost past him and then quickly bring the bat around at the last possible second.  There was nothing to really compare it to.  I knew that he had originally learned to hit in a manner that is known in America as “cross-handed” with the dominant right hand below the left, instead of the more common baseball grip that had the right on top.  He later changed that around but retained many of the characteristics of the manner in which he originally learned to hit. It wasn’t until I moved to Ireland that I realised that there was a comparison for Aaron’s swing.  He had developed his game with what is known over here as a “hurling grip” – right-handed players in that sport keep the right hand lower in order to give them more reach and strength with their hurl.  This results in their swing being shorter, quicker and “wristier” than a baseball swing (which is required due to the need to get the ball off before a defender can whack it out of your hand).  Aaron’s swing looks like that of the typical hurler – because that’s how he taught himself – short, quick, powerful.

The highlights would show the homerun again and again, along with Aaron circling the bases as two fans come out of the stands to congratulate him between second and third base.  Henry brushes them off – perhaps saving them from a violent end as there were armed officers in the stadium who could have mistaken them for someone attempting to follow through on the threats against the ballplayer’s life.  Happily, no one made such an attempt and as Vin Scully, one of the announcers that day, put it; “What a great day for the nation – a Black man is getting a standing ovation in the deep South”.  That was true – but it masked the hell that Aaron had gone through in the months preceding the event.

A few months later I found myself back in the newsagent’s shop with my grandfather and he once more bought me a book I had been leafing through.  It was called “Hank Aaron – The Man Who Beat the Babe” – and it cost the somewhat lower amount of $1.25.  My grandfather loved to read and did all he could to engender the same practice in myself – and that was a lesson that took.  I still have a good few of the books he bought or bequeathed to me, but this one holds a special place, for it was the one that I think first started to wake me up to what “racism” was – and why it was wrong.

Honestly, there was no reason to think that it would do so.  The work was one of those “quicky” publications that typically get commissioned right after a big event.  These are usually very formulaic – they tell the story of how the subject grew up obeying his parents, applied himself dutifully to his task, appreciates his fans, loves his country, remains humble and concludes with, essentially, a newspaper account of the big event itself.  The work is rushed onto shelves while there are still headlines to capitalize upon and sells copies on the back of all that free publicity. 

There was no reason to think this book would be different – but it was.


I was lucky in that I had stumbled on to a work done by a sportswriter by the name of Phil Musick, who was based out of Pittsburgh.  Musick, it turns out, was not the kind of guy who wrote only for the paycheck. The Aaron book did not follow the formula – maybe partially because Musick would have had the winter to get ready for the event itself so could do a bit more work – but more likely due to the fact that it just wasn’t in his nature.  Musick, who passed away in 2010, is still cited on the internet as one of the great regional sportswriters that used to dot the American landscape. Bill Bryson (father of the travel writer of the same name) was such a local legend.  Peter Gammons was a latter day version in Boston, while Jim Murray toiled in L.A.  Musick was of that ilk.  He covered sports in the Steel City for years and his quotes still arise in a number of contexts – for instance, after Pirates star Roberto Clemente (who was the subject of another of his books) died while on a humanitarian mission to provide relief to earthquake victims, Musick wrote: “Now it’s too late to tell him there were things he did on a ball field that made me wish I was Shakespeare.”. That quote is still sometimes pulled out of the closet when a transcendent star dies.

Musick wasn’t Shakespeare, but he could write and he was honest.  That honesty shone through in the Aaron book, which was far above the typical quicky release.  He talked of Aaron’s upbringing, yes, but did not sugar coat it.  He described the hate mail, the abuse from the stands, Aaron’s struggles with Atlanta and its racist past, the outspoken advocacy for Blacks to advance into front office jobs and not just be treated as “field hands” (this struggle continues), the hypocrisy of baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn who tried to dictate where Aaron could play and then didn’t bother to show up for the record-breaking event that represented one of his sport’s greatest moments. There were discussions about money, the elusiveness of fame, the difference between flash and substance, the allegation that Aaron wasn’t “Black enough” – real issues. Musick did not dwell on platitudes but related Aaron speaking frankly about how hard it was for him – and how wrong it was for it to have been that hard. The book was a wake-up call for a ten-year old kid and I began to understand that there was more to Aaron’s achievement than simply hitting lots of home runs.  It is not too much of a stretch to say that reading that book started to open my eyes to a world beyond the playing field.  I mean – how could someone want to kill Hank Aaron for hitting home runs while Black?  I bought the book because I watched Hammerin’ Hank, the baseball icon, and reacted as a fan.  After reading the book I began to admire Henry Aaron, the man, and reacted as a student of the game – “the game” being something more than baseball.  I’m glad I still have that book. Thank you Phil Musick.

Over the past year I have found myself returning to the pages of that other book, the 1974 players guide, many times, for a sobering reason.  Since the start of 2020 an unusually high number of notable baseball players have passed away – many of them being players from that era, players I grew up watching and admiring.

Tom Seaver, Lou Brock, Joe Morgan, Dick Allen, Bob Gibson, Phil Niekro, Don Sutton – all those guys (and more) were featured in that book and passed in just the last 12 months.  Then, last week, Henry Aaron joined that team.  The replays of the magic moment again appeared on screen, the vision of that amazing swing reappeared and I reached for the bookshelf, pulled down both the guide and Musick’s work to try to remember what it was like in 1974, absent Watergate, absent Patty Hearst or Evel Knievel, just to remember what it was like to hold a flashlight towards a book long after I should have been asleep and read about someone who aspired to be the best – and then achieved it.  While flipping back through I found this quote, that maybe tells something about how Henry Aaron was able to persevere through all the hate, the pressure, the negativity:

“I’ve learned that when you don’t say anything people think you are satisfied.  I’m not talking about being violent or militant.  I’m talking about standing up for what’s right”.

Rest in peace Henry Aaron.  Thank you for standing up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4mVaJJ4E34

No comments:

Post a Comment

WINK

  I want to talk about a sensitive and multi-faceted subject but I'm pretty sure I'm not a good enough writer to capture all that nu...